
Iomega, Class Act or Class Action?: A Continuing Study Into How Iomega Treats Its Customers

"For the moment, Iomega, I seek from you:
1. An email address for an identified Iomega representative,
with whom I may communicate more effectively and directly.
2. Your promise that by a date certain Iomega will initiate and
maintain a 24-hour-per day, 7-day-per-week, nationwide,
telephone (1.800) service that is without any charge and is
manned at effective levels; for the technical support of
existing users and of potential customers.
3. Your promise that Iomega will give customers reasonable
support by email, as well.
4. Your promise to monitor the WWW in an effort to seek out
disgruntled customers and equitably to fix their problems.
"Given your corporation's history, I consider these to be extremely fair
demands. If you decide to meet these demands, I believe [that] all
(including Iomega) will profit from that decision."
Perhaps the word "demand" was too strong, for it seems to have offended some readers. I meant to imply a legal connotation, because if I were already a client with a lawyer in a courtroom, it would be my lawyer's job to tell the Court my demands. And, Iomega has, after all, been asked by the Utah Office of the Attorney General to respond to my complaint. A reasonable interpretation of this word "demand" is that I am laying out in my wish list the kinds of things I would have Iomega do in order to satisfy me and to get this monkey (Langford)

(Courtesy Scott Tambert, www.PDImages.com)
What Dave Wants (20 November 1996)
Thank you for your interest!
©Stephen A. Langford, Oro Valley, Arizona, 9 April 1997. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This document may be freely transmitted in its entirety, so long as no monies are earned during the transaction/s. Permission is required for any and all other pertinent circumstances.
(Metering for this page begun 17 September 1996.)![]()